Lab4-Using ArcGIS Pro to Generate an Orthomosaic with UAS Imagery
Introduction
- What is the Ortho Mapping Suite in ArcPro? How does it relate to UAS imagery?
- What is Bundle Block Adjustment?
- What is the advantage of using this method? Is it perfect?
Methods
For this lab, we created an orthomosaic using ArcPro. We took a series of photographs that were provided to us for the lab from the 319 folder and imported them to the program. We then began the processing for the creation of the orthomosaic, which created the initial flight path and boarder of the image and placed it over a basemap. Then we processed the bundle block adjustment which took a very long time but provides for a more accurate and visually appealing final product. Then a new layout was made, and the photo was placed over a basemap and a reference map was added to the top corner, along with a scale bar, north arrow, metadata, title, and watermark in order to create the final map.
- What key characteristics should go into folder and file naming conventions
- Why is file management so key in working with UAS data?
- What key forms of metadata should be associated with every UAS mission?
Figure 1: Table of MetaData
Results
- Describe you maps in detail. Discuss their quality, and where you see issues in the maps. Are there areas on the map where the data quality is poor or missing?
- Processing time is time and money in the UAS world. Here you want to create a table that shows the time it took.
- How much time did it take to process the data.
Figure 2: Processing Time Table
Figure 3: Orthomosaic
Figure 4: Map of Lab 4 Flight
Conclusion
- Summarize the Orthomosaic Tool.
- Summarize the process in terms of time invested and quality of output.
- Think of what was discussed with this orthomosaic in terms of accuracy. How might a higher resolution DTM (from LiDAR) make this more accurate? Why might this approach not work in a dynamic environment such as a mine?
As of now the orthomosaic is just a surface model, meaning there is no real depth to the image. The trees and buildings have depth but not 3d qualities to them therefore they can not count as terrain. By adding another level to the image, like from LiDAR data once could create a terrain model because actual depth could be given to the image. This would be more accurate as the the features of the image that have terrain could be given more dynamic values such as an accurate height and depth of field. This can be complex in a dynamic environment because as objects on the ground move while the flight is conducted the end result could produce errors or be corrupted because as the data is collected repeatedly due to the high overlap, the same piece of the image could return different values. Things such as leaves rustling in the wind and then recorded using images or LiDAR would produce problems.
Comments
Post a Comment